Page 4 of 7
Re: George Miller
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:48 pm
by junkers88
1
Re: George Miller
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:49 pm
by junkers88
rotaredom wrote:tool zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
[/quote]
Luckily I don't need to resort to multiple explanation marks to make a point.
And as for multiple letters and your argument basis.
You must be about 15, so I'll lay off.
Re: George Miller
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:53 pm
by rotaredom
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzHUH?zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Re: George Miller
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:54 pm
by 4073Max
I am more than happy to have anyone disagree with my views. What I cant handle is you coming on here and posting a story that cant be verified about an actor and a replica. This world is too small for someone here not to either be involved or know about it. There are not many replicas in Sydney.
Disagree all you like just stop posting derogatory unfounded stories.
As for broadminded, it was you who accused some fans here of being creepy
Re: George Miller
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:56 pm
by delusional
Sure plenty of us live and work around the Cross and live in hope of another MM film.How could it be that you were the only one out of dozen's, that seem to know anything about this.?Any regular fan would have pix to prove it, or the media would be all over it faster than a fat kid on a cup cake.Were you the writer/director of that Mad Max film that was shot in Melbourne early this year?.Do you know for shore Mr Miller never check's out forum activity or direct's his staff to.Initially your idea's were just but watching you squirm agressively when some member's question your authenticity, well..... .Your getting more creepier with every post

Please forward something relevant and of substance.Maybe some fact's

Re: George Miller
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:01 am
by rotaredom
must be shaking with rage now he hit the submit button twice,calm down tool zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Re: George Miller
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:16 am
by junkers88
4073Max wrote:
Disagree all you like just stop posting derogatory unfounded stories.
Unfounded by your recollection only.
What happens when someone confirms it?
Is it less 'derogatory' then?
I guess that we just have to sit back and wait.
I actually can't concede this one.
Back on topic.
What about my point? Do you agree or disagree?
Do you think Miller welcomes fans input or advice regarding FURY ROAD?
This is what this is actually about.
Not the chassis number on the aforementioned replica.
Re: George Miller
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:47 am
by delusional
Actually, this now is about you and where your claims arise from.Not who's car it is, we have already established No Car.Need to get back on solid ground.Are these just your "creepy" vision's or fact.Why even question Miller's thought process.Your fast diminishing here, and i figure by the end of this session you will have been "hosed off", tripper.

Re: George Miller
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:37 am
by rotaredom
sit back and wait how long junky??? it's nearly 2008 and your recollection was 2000-2002,what exactly would we be waiting for? a vision?
No one has asked you to concede anything,you were asked to back up your story/fairytale considering it was used in relation to mocking 'creepy' fans,some of which you say are on here, not the smartest of moves.
you could've had a sensible debate here but being an over educated smart ass you thought you would try your hand at being all knowing high and mighty...was that a backfire I just heard?
the nameless members you mock with your 'creepy' attack are of no relevance to me,if they want to sit back and let you insult them that is there problem but you,being the attacker, is of relevance to me and I will make my point whether in bad taste or not,you know exactly what I mean, you could say it is of a similar context to your point about the obsessive creepy fans on here!........get my point?
post with respect for others and receive respect in return,fire members up and expect to get burnt!
Re: George Miller
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 2:01 am
by The Sockpuppet
This is easy,
The reason that he knows exactly when it happened is because it was junkers himself standing out the front trying to get the attention of G.Miller, but it all turned bad didn't it and no one payed you any notice. That's why only you remember it. You know what they say about a woman scorned.